Context:
-
The Supreme Court of India has paused its November judgment concerning the definition of the Aravali mountain range after widespread concerns were raised about its environmental implications.
-
The pause reflects judicial caution over the possibility that a restrictive definition could lead to ecological degradation, particularly through unregulated mining in sensitive zones.
Key Highlights:
Judicial Intervention and Review:
-
The Court has proposed the constitution of a panel of experts to undertake a multi-temporal evaluation of environmental impacts arising from the definition.
-
It has sought clarity on whether the earlier definition expanded ‘non-Aravali’ areas, thereby weakening environmental safeguards.
Environmental Concerns:
-
The restrictive definition sparked fears of unbridled mining activities in regions excluded from the officially demarcated Aravali range.
-
The Court stressed that the definition must be nuanced, balanced, and scientifically robust, ensuring protection of the entire ecologically contiguous terrain.
Ecological Significance of the Aravalis:
-
The Aravali range functions as a green barrier against the eastward spread of the Thar Desert.
-
Plays a crucial role in reducing air pollution and regulating climate in Delhi-NCR and adjoining regions.
-
Supports biodiversity, groundwater recharge, and ecological stability in northwestern India.
Scientific Basis for Definition:
-
The Court emphasised that demarcation must rely on exhaustive geological, geomorphological, and ecological assessments, rather than narrow administrative criteria.
-
A fragmented approach could undermine ecosystem-level protection.
Relevant Prelims Points:
-
Aravali Range:
-
One of the oldest mountain ranges in the world.
-
Extends ~692 km, from Delhi → Haryana → Rajasthan → Gujarat.
-
-
Issue: Restrictive legal definition of Aravalis.
-
Causes:
-
Ambiguous geological boundaries
-
Administrative demarcation ignoring ecological continuity
-
-
Impact:
-
Increased mining risk
-
Loss of forest cover
-
Desertification and air pollution
-
-
Government/Judicial Action:
-
Suo motu judicial review
-
Proposal for expert-led scientific reassessment
-
Relevant Mains Points:
-
Facts & Definitions:
-
Ecological Integrity: Capacity of an ecosystem to maintain natural processes and biodiversity.
-
Suo Motu: Court initiating proceedings on its own motion.
-
-
Conceptual Clarity:
-
Environmental governance requires landscape-level conservation, not fragmented protection.
-
Judicial definitions must align with scientific realities.
-
-
Concerns:
-
Legal loopholes enabling environmental exploitation
-
Weak enforcement of mining regulations
-
-
Way Forward:
-
Adopt scientific, ecosystem-based definitions
-
Integrate geological, ecological, and hydrological data
-
Strengthen coordination between courts, governments, and environmental regulators
-
UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):
-
GS 1: Physical Geography of India – Mountain Systems
-
GS 3: Environment & Ecology, Conservation, Mining Regulations
-
Prelims: Location, role, and ecological importance of the Aravalis
