A Year Later β€” From Colonial-Era Laws to New Criminal Codes

Context:
In 2024, India replaced its colonial-era criminal laws with three new legislations β€” Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). One year into their implementation, the focus has shifted from legislative intent to ground-level execution, highlighting both technological innovations and institutional challenges in policing and justice delivery.

Key Highlights:

Legislative Transition:

  • IPC β†’ BNS, CrPC β†’ BNSS, Indian Evidence Act β†’ BSA (effective 2024).
  • Aim: Decolonisation of criminal law, faster justice delivery, and integration of technology-driven processes.

Digital Policing & Evidence Collection:

  • Majority of FIRs registered digitally through CCTNS, easing adaptation to new laws.
  • e-Sakshya mobile application, developed by NIC in consultation with MHA, enables:
    • Real-time photo/video capture of crime scenes
    • Geo-tagging and timestamping
    • Secure upload to National Government Cloud (NGC) under Sakshya Lockers

Legal Backing under BNSS:

  • e-Sakshya supports six BNSS provisions related to search, seizure, witness recording, and custody of property.
  • Section 176 BNSS mandates forensic expert presence at crime scenes, improving investigation quality.

Institutional Capacity Building:

  • Expansion of forensic infrastructure through institutions like National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU), Raipur.

Operational Challenges:

  • Courts lack direct ICJS integration, forcing IOs to rely on pen drives, causing duplication and added costs.
  • Device constraints:
    • e-Sakshya supports only Android 10+ with 1 GB free storage.
    • Many police stations have only one tablet, pushing IOs to use personal phones.
  • Offline usability issues: limited SID creation (max 5) and 4-minute cap per video.
  • Reluctance of accused during electronic recording persists, though expected to reduce over time.

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • Issue: Implementation of new criminal laws and tech-enabled policing.
  • Causes:
    • Need to replace colonial legal frameworks.
    • Demand for transparent, accountable, and efficient criminal justice system.
  • Government Initiatives:
    • BNS, BNSS, BSA (2024)
    • CCTNS for FIR registration
    • ICJS for system-wide integration
    • e-Sakshya App for digital evidence
  • Benefits:
    • Tamper-proof digital evidence using SHA-256 hash values.
    • Reduced scope for evidence manipulation.
    • Improved forensic-led investigations.
  • Challenges & Impact:
    • Inadequate digital infrastructure.
    • Delay in post-mortem reports, affecting rape and homicide cases.
    • Ambiguity in petty offence definitions under Sections 303(1) & 112 BNS.
    • Cybercrime probes hampered as many state forensic labs are not notified under the IT Act.

Relevant Mains Points:

  • Key Provisions & Concepts:
    • Section 176 BNSS: Mandatory forensic expert at crime scenes.
    • Section 530 BNSS: Video conferencing for witness examination (underutilised).
    • Hashing (SHA-256): Ensures integrity of electronic evidence.
    • Digital Chain of Custody: Continuous digital tracking of evidence.
  • Governance and Polity Linkages:
    • Reflects shift towards technology-enabled rule of law.
    • Highlights need for judicial readiness alongside police reforms.
  • Challenges in Implementation:
    • Fragmented coordination among police, judiciary, forensics, health, and IT sectors.
    • Digital divide within policing infrastructure.
  • Way Forward:
    • Direct ICJS access for courts to eliminate redundancy.
    • Provision of adequate devices and wider OS compatibility for IOs.
    • Notification of state cyber forensic labs under the IT Act.
    • Regular feedback loops from IOs and stakeholders.
    • Capacity building and sensitisation of police and public on tech-driven justice processes.
« Prev December 2025 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031