High Surfactant Levels, Ammonia and Microplastics in Yamuna: TERI

Context:
β€’ A recent TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) study has flagged severe chemical and microplastic pollution in the Delhi stretch of the Yamuna River.
β€’ The findings were presented to the Delhi Government, prompting administrative action to strengthen river pollution control and governance mechanisms.
β€’ The issue highlights persistent gaps in urban wastewater management and industrial regulation.

Key Highlights:

Findings of the TERI Study
β€’ Based on 100 water samples from 50 locations, the study identified pollution hotspots with high concentrations of:
– Surfactants (detergent chemicals)
– Ammonia
– Microplastics
β€’ Major contributors include untreated sewage, industrial effluents, and solid waste dumping, leading to frothing, chemical contamination, and plastic load.

Critical Pollution Sources
β€’ Najafgarh and Shahdara drains identified as major carriers of pollutants into the Yamuna.
β€’ Underperforming STPs and CETPs unable to treat excess surfactants and ammonia.
β€’ Delhi Jal Board acknowledged the lack of infrastructure to handle high surfactant loads.

Recommendations by TERI
β€’ Monthly monitoring of major drains, STPs, and CETPs for microplastic contamination.
β€’ Upgradation of STPs using:
– Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs)
– Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) technologies
β€’ Penal action against non-compliant units discharging untreated waste.
β€’ Determination of permissible limits for surfactants in wastewater.

Government Response
β€’ Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa directed departments to examine TERI’s recommendations.
β€’ Announcement of an inter-departmental coordination cell to improve implementation and accountability.

Relevant Prelims Points:
β€’ Issue: Rising chemical and microplastic pollution in urban rivers.
β€’ Causes:
– Untreated sewage and industrial discharge.
– Lack of surfactant treatment technology.
β€’ Government Measures:
– Strengthening STP monitoring.
– Inter-departmental coordination mechanism.
β€’ Benefits of Action:
– Improved water quality and aquatic health.
– Reduced frothing and chemical toxicity.
β€’ Challenges:
– High cost of STP upgradation.
– Weak enforcement of effluent norms.
β€’ Impact:
– Direct effect on urban water security and public health.

Relevant Mains Points:
β€’ Facts & Definitions:
– Surfactants: Compounds that reduce surface tension between substances.
– STP: Facility treating domestic sewage.
– CETP: Plant treating industrial effluents from clusters.
β€’ Conceptual Linkages:
– Urban river pollution as a governance and environmental challenge.
– Microplastics as an emerging pollutant with long-term ecological impacts.
β€’ Policy & Governance Issues:
– Fragmented institutional responsibility.
– Absence of regulatory caps on detergent surfactants.
β€’ Way Forward:
– Introduce regulatory limits on surfactants at manufacturing level.
– Invest in advanced wastewater treatment technologies.
– Strengthen real-time monitoring and compliance enforcement.
– Promote biodegradable detergents and public awareness.

UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):
β€’ GS 3: Environment & Ecology, Pollution Control, Sustainable Development
β€’ GS 2: Governance, Urban Administration, Environmental Regulation

« Prev January 2026 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031