In MGNREGA Shadow, Why GRAMG Act May Face a Bumpy Road Ahead

Context:

  • The Garib Kalyan Rozgar Abhiyaan Mission (GRAMG) Act, 2025, proposed to replace the two-decade-old MGNREGA, has been passed by Parliament amid concerns over its design, funding structure, and federal implications.
  • While projected as a reform to address rural employment needs, the Act raises questions regarding fiscal sustainability, Centre–State relations, and implementation capacity, especially for cash-strapped States.

Key Highlights:

Background: MGNREGA Framework

  • MGNREGA (2005) guarantees 100 days of wage employment to rural households.
  • Key features:
    • Demand-driven entitlement
    • Centre–State cost sharing (wages largely by Centre; materials shared)
    • Legal guarantee with transparency mechanisms
  • Plays a crucial role during agrarian distress and lean agricultural seasons.

Features of GRAMG Act, 2025

  • Introduces new funding and operational mechanisms.
  • Proposes revised cost-sharing patterns between Centre and States.
  • Shifts from MGNREGA’s demand-driven model towards more structured allocations.
  • Seeks to rationalise expenditure and improve efficiency.

Fiscal Implications

  • Significant additional fiscal burden on States.
  • Estimates suggest:
    • Higher State share in wages and materials.
    • States with weaker finances (e.g., Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, UP) may struggle.
  • Concerns that States may delay implementation or reduce coverage due to budgetary stress.

Centre–State Relations

  • MGNREGA allowed States flexibility in responding to local employment demand.
  • GRAMG’s design may:
    • Reduce State autonomy
    • Increase dependence on Centre’s fiscal priorities
  • Raises questions under cooperative federalism.

Transition Challenges

  • Managing the shift from MGNREGA to GRAMG:
    • Administrative restructuring
    • Capacity-building at local levels
    • Ensuring uninterrupted wage payments
  • Risk of exclusion errors during transition phase.

Stakeholders Involved

  • Ministry of Rural Development
  • State Governments
  • Panchayati Raj Institutions
  • Rural workers and households

Significance / Concerns

  • Potential dilution of legal employment guarantee.
  • Risk of undermining a proven social safety net.
  • Fiscal stress may widen regional disparities in employment generation.

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • Issue: Replacement of MGNREGA by GRAMG Act
  • Causes:
    • Rising fiscal burden
    • Demand for reform in rural employment schemes
  • Government Initiatives:
    • GRAMG Act, 2025
    • Rural employment restructuring
  • Benefits Claimed:
    • Improved efficiency
    • Rationalised funding
  • Challenges:
    • State fiscal capacity
    • Transition management
  • Impact:
    • Possible reduction in guaranteed rural employment

Relevant Mains Points:

  • Facts & Provisions:
    • MGNREGA – demand-driven, legal guarantee
    • GRAMG – revised cost-sharing and implementation framework
  • Conceptual Clarity:
    • Cooperative federalism
    • Welfare vs fiscal discipline
    • Rights-based vs scheme-based approach
  • Keywords:
    • Rural employment
    • Fiscal federalism
    • Social safety net
    • Demand-driven welfare
  • Way Forward:
    • Phased and consultative transition
    • Adequate Central fiscal support
    • Protect legal guarantee of employment
    • Strengthen Panchayati Raj capacity
    • Continuous monitoring to prevent exclusion

UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):

  • GS Paper II: Welfare schemes, Centre–State relations
  • GS Paper III: Inclusive growth, public finance
  • GS Paper I: Rural society and livelihoods
  • GS Paper IV: Ethics – social justice and state responsibility

 

 

« Prev January 2026 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031