India and EU Begin Cooperation to Link Carbon Markets for Climate Governance

Context:
• The European Union (EU) and India have announced a New Strategic EU–India Agenda (September 17, 2025) with a focus on linking carbon markets — a major step towards North–South cooperation in climate governance.
• The initiative aims to align India’s evolving Indian Carbon Market (ICM) with the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to prevent double carbon penalties on Indian exporters.

Key Highlights:

  • Framework for EU–India Climate Partnership
  • The EU–India Strategic Agenda is structured around five cooperation pillars, with climate transition and clean trade forming a key focus area.
  • The proposed linkage will enable carbon prices paid within India’s domestic carbon market to be credited against CBAM levies, reducing tariff-like penalties on Indian exporters.
  • The initiative seeks to create mutual recognition mechanisms between India’s ICM and the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) — the world’s largest carbon market.
  • Rationale and Benefits
  • Designed to avoid double penalization, ensuring exporters do not pay carbon costs both domestically and under CBAM.
  • Encourages early decarbonization and green investment in India by rewarding carbon-efficient production.
  • Promotes North–South climate cooperation, bridging the gap between developed carbon regulators and emerging market frameworks.
  • Key Challenges
  • Structural Gaps: India’s ICM remains under development — lacking a full auctioning system, registry architecture, and compliance-grade verification mechanisms.
  • Price Disparity: Carbon prices in India are €5–€10 per tonne, compared to €60–€80 per tonne in the EU ETS, making price parity complex.
  • Legal Compatibility: EU’s CBAM mandates tonne-for-tonne accounting of embedded carbon, whereas India’s ICM operates on intensity-based improvements and project offsets.
  • Political Sensitivities: India and other developing nations have viewed CBAM as unilateral and protectionist, raising legitimacy concerns over aligning with it.
  • Implementation Considerations
  • India must undertake ICM structural redesign, including:
    • Legally binding emissions caps,
    • Establishing independent carbon regulators,
    • Setting up national emissions registries for transparency and market integrity.
  • Carbon price alignment could be achieved through sectoral carbon contracts or floor price negotiations, though both face political and economic pushback.
  • Maintaining policy continuity and transparency in the ICM will be vital to protect exporters from full CBAM levies if linkage negotiations stall.

 

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • Indian Carbon Market (ICM):
    • Launched under the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022, administered by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE).
    • Aims to create a national framework for carbon credit trading.
  • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM):
    • Introduced by the European Union in 2023.
    • Imposes a carbon tariff on imports from countries with weaker emission standards to prevent carbon leakage.
    • Initially applies to steel, cement, aluminum, fertilizer, hydrogen, and electricity sectors.
  • EU Emissions Trading System (ETS):
    • World’s first major carbon market, launched in 2005.
    • Operates on a cap-and-trade principle with compliance-grade emissions caps.

Relevant Mains Points:

  • Significance:
    • Represents the first attempt at linking carbon pricing regimes across the North–South divide.
    • Could set a global precedent for trade-aligned decarbonization strategies.
    • Helps India transition from voluntary offsets to compliance-grade carbon trading.
  • Economic Implications:
    • Protects Indian exports (steel, aluminum, cement) from high CBAM charges.
    • Encourages green technology investments and corporate ESG alignment.
  • Geopolitical Dimension:
    • Signals convergence between EU’s Green Deal and India’s sustainable growth vision.
    • Positions India as a bridge between developing economies and Western climate regimes.
  • Challenges and Way Forward:
    • Harmonize measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) standards with global norms.
    • Ensure equity and fairness so developing nations aren’t penalized for historical emissions.
    • Develop sectoral pilot programs (steel, cement, energy) to test linkage feasibility.
    • Foster technology transfers and carbon finance partnerships to strengthen ICM infrastructure.
« Prev February 2026 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728