India’s Food Colouring Woes and Measures to Tackle Auramine O Adulteration

Context:

  • Auramine O, a banned industrial dye, has been repeatedly detected in Indian food items, raising serious public health and food safety concerns.

  • Despite existing regulations, its recurring presence highlights enforcement gaps, low awareness, and economic incentives driving food adulteration.

Key Highlights:

Nature of the Issue – Auramine O

  • Auramine O is a synthetic yellow dye primarily used in textiles, leather, and paper industries.

  • It is not approved as a food colourant in India.

  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies it as possibly carcinogenic, linked to liver damage, kidney toxicity, and cancer risks.

Reasons for Continued Use

  • Low cost and easy availability in local chemical markets.

  • Used by small-scale food vendors to mimic saffron or turmeric colour in sweets, snacks, and spices.

  • Weak enforcement capacity and lack of awareness among vendors contribute to persistence.

Regulatory and Administrative Response

  • Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has intensified surveillance drives, especially during festivals and peak consumption periods.

  • Increased sampling, testing, and penalties under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

  • Focus on regulating chemical supply chains, not just end food products.

Role of Awareness and Technology

  • Deployment of rapid food testing kits at field level.

  • Consumer education campaigns to help identify non-permitted colours and encourage safer choices.

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • Issue: Food adulteration using non-permitted industrial dyes.

  • Causes: Low-cost substitutes, informal food sector, weak inter-state enforcement.

  • Government Initiatives:

    • Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 – legal framework against adulteration.

    • FSSAI surveillance, inspections, and awareness drives.

  • Benefits of Action: Improved public health, reduced cancer risks, safer food ecosystem.

  • Challenges: Resource constraints of states, fragmented markets, low consumer awareness.

  • Impact: Direct link to nutrition security, public health, and SDG-3 (Good Health and Well-being).

Relevant Mains Points:

  • Key Institutions: FSSAI, IARC, State Food Safety Departments.

  • Conceptual Clarity:

    • Difference between permitted food colours and industrial dyes.

    • Food adulteration as a governance and public health issue.

  • Governance Dimension: Need for uniform enforcement across states, better coordination between chemical regulators and food authorities.

  • Science & Technology: Importance of portable testing tools and laboratory capacity.

  • Way Forward:

    • Stricter control over chemical dye markets.

    • Mandatory vendor training and licensing.

    • Strengthened consumer awareness, clear labelling norms, and deterrent penalties.

UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):

  • GS II: Governance, regulatory institutions, public policy implementation.

  • GS III: Science & Technology (toxic substances), Environment & Health, Food security.

  • Prelims: Food safety laws, institutions, carcinogenic substances.

« Prev January 2026 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031