GS II-Polity
The post-Article 370 scenario in Kashmir remains a subject of intense debate, with concerns regarding governance, democracy, security, and development.
Key Concerns
Democratic Deficit: Critics argue that the decision sidelined the democratic voice of Kashmiris, as the revocation was carried out based on the Governor’s approval rather than an elected state government.
Comparison to Colonial Rule: Some draw parallels between this move and historical instances where constitutional changes were imposed without public consent, likening it to British colonial governance in India.
Unilateral Revocation: Article 370 was originally part of Jammu and Kashmir’s terms of accession to India, making its unilateral removal contentious, as some view it akin to altering an agreement between two autonomous entities.
Administrative Challenges: Governance in the region has faced criticism for inefficiencies, a heavy reliance on non-cadre officers, and allegations of corruption, raising concerns about bureaucratic accountability.
Militancy Spread: The security situation has seen militancy extending beyond Kashmir into Jammu, with an increase in attacks and casualties.
Developmental Concerns
Infrastructure and Power Supply: Despite promises of development, there has been little improvement in electricity availability and road conditions.
Crime and Corruption: Reports suggest a rise in crime and corruption, along with concerns that local businesses are increasingly dominated by external players.
Industrialization and Employment: Expectations of large-scale industrialization and job creation have not been met, leading to skepticism over the economic benefits of the move.