Overseas Bill Betrays Migrant Workers

Context:

  • India’s Overseas Mobility (Facilitation and Welfare) Bill, 2025, intended to replace the Emigration Act, 1983, has drawn criticism for weakening protections for Indian migrant workers, particularly low-skilled labourers migrating to Gulf countries and Southeast Asia.
  • The Bill is being debated amid India’s economic rise, which contrasts sharply with the precarious realities faced by its overseas workforce.

Key Highlights:

Nature of Indian Labour Migration

  • Migrant workers include construction labourers, domestic workers, sanitation staff, factory hands, largely from Kerala, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and other States.
  • They remit billions of dollars annually, sustaining household incomes and contributing to India’s foreign exchange reserves.
  • Migration is often distress-driven, marked by debt, deception, and lack of legal safeguards.

Provisions of the New Overseas Bill

  • Replaces the Emigration Act, 1983, under the guise of simplification and efficiency.
  • Shifts focus from worker protection to bureaucratic facilitation.
  • Removes or dilutes safeguards introduced in 2021 rules, which had treated migrants as agents of their own fate, enabling exploitative recruiters to escape accountability.

Key Concerns and Criticism

  • Weakens regulation of recruitment agents, increasing vulnerability to fraud and trafficking.
  • Dilutes protections against debt bondage, contract substitution, and forced labour.
  • Undermines gender-sensitive protections, disproportionately affecting women domestic workers.
  • Over-centralisation:
    • Weakens State-level oversight, despite States being closest to migrant realities.
  • Surveillance-heavy approach risks turning migrants into subjects of monitoring rather than rights-bearing citizens.

Exploitation and Structural Risks

  • Migrants face non-payment of wages, passport confiscation, poor living conditions, and limited legal recourse abroad.
  • High-risk migration corridors remain under-regulated, despite known patterns of abuse.
  • Digital accreditation and online systems risk excluding poor, low-literacy migrants.

Significance / Concerns

  • The Bill risks normalising exploitation under the banner of mobility facilitation.
  • Represents a shift from rights-based governance to control-oriented regulation.
  • Undermines India’s moral and constitutional obligation towards its migrant citizens.

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • Labour migration governed by Union List (Entry 81 – Inter-State migration).
  • International obligations under ILO conventions, UN Convention on Migrant Workers (India not a signatory).
  • Concept of debt bondage and modern slavery in migration studies.

UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):

  • GS I: Migration, labour, social justice
  • GS II: Governance, welfare legislation, Centre–State relations
  • GS III: Globalisation, remittances, labour markets
  • GS IV: Ethics, human dignity, State responsibility
« Prev October 2025 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031