Parliamentary Accountability Debate Over Motion of Thanks

Context:
Concerns have arisen regarding parliamentary norms and executive accountability after the Lok Sabha adopted the Motion of Thanks to the President’s Address without a reply from the Prime Minister, an unusual departure from established parliamentary practice.

Key Highlights:

  • Parliamentary Event
  • The Lok Sabha passed the Motion of Thanks on February 5.
  • Traditionally, the debate concludes with the Prime Minister responding to issues raised by Members of Parliament.
  • Speaker’s Explanation
  • Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla cited the possibility of disruptions in the House as the reason for the Prime Minister not replying.
  • Opposition Concerns
  • The Leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, was not allowed to quote from a book by former Army Chief General M.M. Naravane during the debate.
  • Critics argue that such restrictions undermine parliamentary debate and scrutiny.
  • Debate on Parliamentary Norms
  • The absence of the Prime Minister’s reply is seen as deviating from established parliamentary conventions that ensure executive accountability.

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • President’s Address
    • Delivered at the start of the first session of Parliament each year and after general elections under Article 87 of the Constitution.
  • Motion of Thanks
    • A motion moved in both Houses of Parliament after the President’s Address.
    • Allows members to discuss government policies and programmes.
  • Leader of the Opposition
    • Recognized when a party has at least 10% of seats in the House.

Relevant Mains Points:

  • Importance of Parliamentary Debate
  • Parliamentary discussions ensure democratic accountability of the executive.
  • The Prime Minister’s reply traditionally addresses concerns raised during the debate.
  • Executive Accountability
  • Accountability mechanisms include:
    • Question Hour
    • Debates and motions
    • Committee oversight.
  • Role of Parliamentary Norms
  • Parliamentary conventions support transparent governance and effective legislative functioning.
  • Democratic Concerns
  • Limiting debate or bypassing conventions may weaken legislative scrutiny and democratic processes.
  • Way Forward
  • Strengthen adherence to parliamentary conventions and procedures.
  • Promote constructive debate and cooperation between government and opposition.
  • Ensure institutional respect for democratic accountability mechanisms.

UPSC Relevance:

  • GS Paper II – Polity: Parliamentary procedures and executive accountability.
  • GS Paper II – Governance: Strengthening democratic institutions.
« Prev September 2026 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930