Purohit against freeing seven Rajiv case convicts

In response to the State government’s proposal in February 2014 and March 2016 to release the convicts, the order said the move would “set a very dangerous precedent and lead to international ramifications”. Before making its recommendation in September last year, the government received opinion from Advocate-General Vijay Narayan too. He held that the Governor had “unfettered power” under Article 161 (to grant pardons and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases) to decide on their release. In the last year or so, the State government sent a few reminders to the Raj Bhavan, but the response was that the matter was under “consideration”, said the sources. The convicts in question are Nalini Sriharan, her husband Sriharan alias Murugan, Suthendraraja alias Santhan, Robert Payas, S. Jayakumar alias Jayakumaran, A.G. Perarivalan alias Arivu, and Ravichandran alias Ravi. Four of the convicts — Sriharan, Santhan, Robert Payas and Jayakumar — are Sri Lankan nationals. After the State Cabinet had made its recommendation to the Governor on the release, Mr. Purohit met people from the two sides – one urging the Governor to accept the Cabinet’s decision at the earliest and the other, not favouring any hasty decision. Among the representatives of the two sides were Arputhammal, mother of Perarivalan, and relatives of the victims of the bomb blast that killed former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and 15 others at Sriperumbudur in May 1991. Originally, in January 1998, a trial court awarded death sentence to all 26 accused in the case. In May 1999, the Supreme Court commuted the sentence to life for three – Robert Payas, Jayakumar and Ravichandran – while confirming the death sentence for the other four, while the rest were released. In April 2000, the then Governor M. Fathima Beevi accepted the Cabinet’s decision to commute the death sentence of Nalini to life. In February 2014, the Supreme Court reduced the death sentence to life for Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan. The basic argument being adduced in favour of all the convicts for their premature release is that the convicts had spent more than 25 years in prison. In May this year, the Supreme Court disposed of a petition filed by six persons against the State government’s 2014 proposal to grant the convicts remission. Subsequently, Mr. Purohit sought opinion from legal experts who were outside the State. At that time, Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president K.S. Alagiri said that though the court had ruled that it was for the Governor to decide on the matter of release, it had not suggested any particular decision on the part of the Governor. In July, the Madras High Court held as “not maintainable” a writ petition filed by Nalini, who had wanted a direction to the Governor to “countersign” the government’s decision.

Source : https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/purohit-against-freeing-seven-rajiv-case-convicts/article29730464.ece

About ChinmayaIAS Academy - Current Affairs

Check Also


CONTEXT: India ranked 131 among 189 countries on the Human Development Index (HDI) for 2019, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Get Free Updates to Crack the Exam!
Subscribe to our Newsletter for free daily updates