Supreme Court Suggests ‘Romeo-Juliet’ Clause in POCSO to Prevent Misuse

Context:
The Supreme Court has urged the Union Government to consider introducing a ‘Romeo-Juliet’ clause in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act to prevent misuse in cases of consensual adolescent relationships.

Key Highlights:

  • Judicial Observation
  • Court noted instances where POCSO is used by families to:
    • Settle personal scores.
    • Criminalize consensual teenage relationships.
  • Concern over young boys being jailed under statutory rape provisions.
  • Judgment copy circulated to the Union Law Secretary.
  • Proposed ‘Romeo-Juliet’ Clause
  • Would exempt consensual sexual relationships between:
    • Teenagers close in age.
  • Aims to prevent:
    • Criminalization of adolescent romance.
    • Misapplication of stringent child protection law.
  • Legal and Ethical Concerns
  • Need to balance:
    • Protection of minors from exploitation.
    • Avoiding unjust prosecution in consensual cases.
  • Raises debate on age of consent and evolving adolescent autonomy.

Relevant Prelims Points:

  • POCSO Act, 2012:
    • Protects children (<18 years) from sexual offences.
    • Gender-neutral legislation.
    • Provides for Special Courts and child-friendly procedures.
  • Statutory Rape:
    • Sexual activity with a minor irrespective of consent.
  • Age of Consent in India:
    • 18 years.
  • POCSO overrides provisions of IPC in child sexual offences.

Relevant Mains Points:

GS 2 – Polity

  • Judicial activism in recommending legislative reform.
  • Doctrine of proportionality in criminal law.
  • Need to prevent misuse of protective legislation.
  • Federal legislative competence in criminal law (Concurrent List).

GS 2 – Social Justice

  • Balancing child protection with adolescent rights.
  • Concerns over:
    • Criminal justice burden.
    • Social stigma.
    • Reformative vs punitive approach.
  • Comparative global practices allow “close-in-age exemptions”.
  • Risk:
    • Loopholes may be exploited if safeguards are weak.
  • Way Forward
  • Constitute expert committee including:
    • Child rights experts.
    • Psychologists.
    • Legal scholars.
  • Define clear age-gap thresholds.
  • Maintain strict penalties for coercion or exploitation.
  • Increase awareness about adolescent health and consent.
  • Strengthen counselling and mediation mechanisms.

UPSC Relevance:
Child protection laws, Judicial review, Criminal law reform, Social justice, Balancing rights and protection in welfare legislation.

« Prev May 2026 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31