Supreme Court Tightens Rules on Tiger Safaris and Tourism for Conservation

Context:

  • The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment aimed at strengthening tiger conservation by regulating tourism activities and mandating Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZs) around tiger reserves.

  • The ruling followed findings of ecological violations and mismanagement in the Jim Corbett Tiger Reserve, examined by an expert committee.

  • The judgment seeks to balance conservation priorities with regulated ecotourism, in line with India’s commitments to wildlife protection.

Key Highlights:

Regulation of Tiger Safaris

  • Tiger safaris permitted only on:

    • Non-forest land or degraded forest land

    • Located strictly in buffer zones

  • Prohibited areas:

    • Core / Critical Tiger Habitats (CTH)

    • Identified tiger corridors

  • Exception: Safaris in core areas allowed only if attached to a full-fledged rescue and rehabilitation centre.

Ban on Night Tourism

  • Complete prohibition on night tourism inside tiger reserves.

  • Strict regulation of vehicular movement at night, including:

    • Restrictions on road widening

    • Control of night-time traffic in core habitats.

Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZs)

  • All tiger reserves must:

    • Notify ESZs within one year

    • Ensure ESZs comply with MoEF&CC guidelines

  • Minimum ESZ area should cover the buffer or fringe zones.

  • ESZs aim to regulate human activities around protected areas.

Ban on Ecologically Harmful Activities

  • Completely banned in buffer and fringe areas:

    • Commercial mining

    • Sawmills

    • Major hydroelectric projects

  • Focus on reversing ecological degradation in and around reserves.

Ecotourism Regulation

  • Shift from mass tourism to regulated ecotourism.

  • Permitted:

    • Eco-friendly resorts in buffer zones

    • Homestays and community-managed tourism

  • Not permitted:

    • Tourism infrastructure in tiger corridors

  • Tourism development governed under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

Tiger Conservation Planning

  • States directed to:

    • Prepare or revise Tiger Conservation Plans within 3 months

    • Notify core and buffer areas within 6 months

  • Objective: Strengthen long-term conservation strategy and habitat integrity.

UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):

GS Paper 3 – Environment & Ecology

  • Wildlife conservation frameworks

  • Regulation of ecotourism

  • Protected Areas, ESZs, and habitat connectivity

  • Role of judiciary in environmental protection

GS Paper 2 – Governance

  • Judicial interventions in policy enforcement

  • Centre–State responsibilities in environmental governance

  • Implementation of statutory guidelines (MoEF&CC)

Prelims Focus

  • Definitions: Core zone, Buffer zone, ESZ, Tiger corridor

  • Legal basis: Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

  • Institutions involved: Supreme Court, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

« Prev July 2025 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031