Context:
-
The Supreme Court of India expressed grave concern over the surge in digital arrest scams and related cyber frauds across India.
-
While hearing a suo motu case, the Court urged the Union Government to consider ratifying the UN Convention against Cybercrime to strengthen international cooperation in investigation and prosecution.
-
The issue highlights the growing challenge of cross-border cybercrime and limitations of domestic enforcement mechanisms.
Key Highlights:
Judicial Observations
-
The Court asked the Central Government to examine the feasibility of ratifying the UN Cybercrime Treaty to:
-
Enable cross-border information sharing
-
Facilitate tracking of international money trails
-
-
Emphasised that cybercrime networks operate transnationally, making global cooperation indispensable.
Digital Arrest Scam Cases
-
The Court is hearing a suo motu matter involving:
-
A 72-year-old lawyer defrauded of ₹5.29 crore
-
-
Another case involved a couple from Ambala, Haryana, cheated of ₹1.05 crore using forged legal orders.
-
Fraudsters impersonated constitutional and enforcement bodies such as:
-
Supreme Court and High Courts
-
Enforcement Directorate
-
-
Victims were threatened with fake arrest notices to extort money.
Directions on Investigation
-
The Bench directed that:
-
Accused persons should not be granted bail until completion of investigation.
-
-
Proposed:
-
Transfer of all digital arrest scam cases to the Central Bureau of Investigation
-
-
Sought details of all such cases registered across different States.
Detailed Insights:
-
The Court stressed the need for:
-
Global law enforcement collaboration
-
Mutual legal assistance treaties (MLATs) and unified cyber frameworks
-
-
The issue was flagged after representations by the Supreme Court Advocate-on-Records Association (SCAORA), which highlighted:
-
Rapid rise in online financial frauds
-
Misuse of fear of law enforcement agencies to psychologically coerce victims
-
-
Digital arrest scams typically involve:
-
Fake summons or arrest threats
-
Forged documents claiming to be from courts or ED
-
Use of encrypted platforms and overseas bank accounts
-
-
Challenges in tackling such crimes include:
-
Jurisdictional limitations
-
Lack of binding international legal mechanisms
-
UPSC Relevance (GS-wise):
GS Paper 2 – Polity & Governance
-
Suo motu powers of constitutional courts
-
Role of judiciary in protecting citizens
-
Centre–State coordination in criminal justice
GS Paper 3 – Internal Security
-
Cyber security threats and financial frauds
-
Transnational organised cybercrime
-
Need for international cooperation frameworks
Prelims Focus
-
Definitions: Suo motu, Cybercrime, Ratification
-
Institutions: Supreme Court, CBI, Enforcement Directorate
-
Emerging threats: Digital arrest scams
