- Recently, China opposed the war games between India and the US near the disputed Sino-India border, saying it’s an interference in the bilateral boundary issue.
- While the drill is yet to be officially confirmed, it is anticipated that the two countries will participate in the 18th edition of the “YudhAbhyas” at Auli in Uttarakhand in October 2022, some 100km from the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
- China says both countries have agreed that no military drill will be held near the LAC, the de facto border between the two countries.
- China cited two agreements signed by India and China in 1993 and 1996, saying the exercise violates both.
- 1993 Agreement on the Maintenance of Peace and Tranquillity along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China Border Areas.
- 1996 Agreement on Confidence-Building Measures in the Military Field Along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China Border Areas.
- A key element of both the 1993 and 1996 agreements is that the two sides would keep their forces in the areas along the LAC to a minimum level. However, the agreements do not define what comprises the minimum level.
- The 1993 and 1996 agreements also mandate that pending a final solution to the boundary question, the two sides shall strictly respect the LAC.
- Use of firearms on the LAC is strictly regulated as per the agreements of 1993, 1996 and 2005.
- It is the largest running joint military training and defence cooperation endeavor between India and the US.
- The exercise was started in 2004 under the US Army Pacific Partnership Program. The exercise is hosted alternately between both countries.
- The exercise aims at enhancing understanding, cooperation and interoperability between two Armies.
- This will help them in undertaking joint operations at battalion level in mountainous terrain with cold climatic conditions under the ambit of the United Nations.
Point of Contention between two countries
- The major disagreements are in the western sector.
- After the 1962 War, the Chinese claimed they had withdrawn to 20 km behind the LAC in November 1959.
- In the eastern sector the border coincides in the main with the so-called McMahon Line, and in the western and middle sectors it coincides in the main with the traditional customary line which has consistently been pointed out by China.
- During the Doklam crisis in 2017, China urged India to abide by the “1959 LAC”.
- India rejected the concept of LAC in both 1959 and 1962.
- India’s objection was that the Chinese line “was a disconnected series of points on a map that could be joined up in many ways, the line should omit gains from aggression in 1962 and therefore should be based on the actual position on September 8, 1962 before the Chinese attack, and the vagueness of the Chinese definition left it open for China to continue its creeping attempt to change facts on the ground by military force.
- As two big emerging economies, China and India need to pursue development alongside each other, move forward in partnership instead of hindrance, and work together for shared progress rather than erecting walls against each other.
- India and China also need to advance the boundary talks to build up mutual trust and realize peace and tranquility in the border areas.
SOURCE: THE HINDU,THE ECONOMIC TIMES,MINT