Disaster Management Act, 2005

GS 3 – Disaster Management  

The Disaster Management Act, 2005 was introduced to create a system for managing disasters in India. It outlines policies for effective disaster management, risk reduction, and rehabilitation.

Objectives

  1. Disaster Management Policies: The Act focuses on creating and implementing policies for disaster management.
  2. Disaster Prevention and Mitigation: It aims to prevent and reduce the impact of disasters by improving preparedness and building capacity.
  3. Disaster Relief: The Act provides financial support to disaster-affected areas.

Funding Mechanism

  • National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF): Provides funds for immediate disaster relief.
  • State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF): Supports state-level disaster response, funded by both the central and state governments.
Institution Composition Role
National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) Chairperson: Prime Minister
Members: Ministers of Home Affairs, Agriculture, Atomic Energy, Science & Technology, etc.
Vice-Chairperson & others: As appointed by the Chairperson
Develop disaster management policies, plans, and guidelines.
National Executive Committee (NEC) Chairperson: Home Secretary
Members: Secretaries of key government departments, Chief of Integrated Defense Staff
Assist NDMA and ensure compliance with its directives.
National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) Director: Appointed by the central government
Members: Experts in disaster management and related fields
Focus on training, research, and capacity building for disaster management.
National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) Control: Director-General (appointed by the government)
Composition: Various battalions from Central Armed Police Forces
Respond to disasters with specialized teams.
State Disaster Management Authority (SDMA) Chairperson: Chief Minister
Members: Ministers appointed by the Chief Minister, including the Minister for Disaster Management
Develop state-level disaster management plans and policies.
State Executive Committee (SEC) Chairperson: State Chief Secretary
Members: Department secretaries, as determined by the state government
Ensure the state disaster plan is implemented and monitored.
District Disaster Management Authority (DDMA) Chairperson: District Magistrate
Co-Chairperson: Local authority representative
Members: Chief Medical Officer, Superintendent of Police, etc.
Plan and implement disaster management at the district level.
Local Authorities Composition: Town planning authorities, municipalities, district and cantonment boards, Panchayati Raj institutions, and other urban development bodies. Implement disaster management according to local plans.

Importance of the Act

  1. Institutional Framework: The Act has created key institutions like NDMA and NDRF to manage disasters effectively.
  2. Disaster Mitigation: It has saved lives and improved disaster preparedness.
  3. Risk Reduction: The Act promotes integrating disaster management into development planning.
  4. Resource Allocation: The establishment of disaster funds ensures quick financial support.
  5. Community Participation: The Act encourages local authorities and communities to take part in disaster management.

Challenges

1. Institutional Issues

  • Leadership Gaps: NDMA has lacked a vice-chairperson for years, which affects its functioning.
  • Lack of Financial Power: NDMA has limited authority over finances, causing delays.
  • Staff Shortage: NDMA is understaffed, with only a few members handling key responsibilities.
  • Low Visibility in Crises: NDMA’s role was criticized for being less visible during crises like COVID-19.

2. Functional Issues

  • Disaster Risk Reduction: The Act hasn’t fully integrated disaster risk reduction into development planning.
  • Public Health Crises: The Act doesn’t adequately address issues like epidemics.
  • Climate Change: The Act doesn’t focus enough on climate change or man-made disasters.
  • Centralized Approach: The Act’s top-down approach sometimes ignores local solutions.

3. Funding Issues

  • Insufficient Funds: The funds provided are often not enough for large-scale disasters.
  • Bureaucratic Delays: Bureaucratic hurdles delay the release of funds.

Suggestions for Improvement

  1. Clarify Definitions: Key terms like ‘hazards’ and ‘mitigation’ should be defined more clearly.
  2. Focus on Prevention: The Act should include chapters on disaster prevention.
  3. Increase Accountability: Stronger judicial oversight will ensure officials are held accountable.
  4. Upgrade Early Warning Systems: Use modern technology like GIS and AI for better early warning and response.
  5. Boost Community Involvement: Engage local communities and policymakers more in disaster management.
  6. Allocate More Resources: Ensure sufficient funds are allocated for disaster management.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *