Supreme Court Ruling on Bail Conditions

GS2 (Polity & Judiciary)

Understanding Bail and Bail Conditions

  • Bail refers to the legal process by which an accused person is released from custody, typically upon payment of a sum of money, ensuring their return for court proceedings.
  • Bail conditions are specific requirements imposed by the court that an accused must comply with to secure their release.
Key Issues & SC Ruling
  1. Google Maps Location as a Bail Condition

Concerns Raised:

  • Right to Privacy: Requiring an accused to share their location violates the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • Ineffectiveness: Google itself clarified that sharing a pinned location does not enable real-time tracking of a person or their device, rendering it ineffective for monitoring purposes.

Supreme Court Decision:

  • The SC ruled that such a requirement is unreasonable and ineffective, as it neither assists law enforcement adequately nor respects privacy rights.
  • The Court emphasized the importance of balancing legal enforcement with individual freedoms, particularly regarding technological interventions in legal processes.
  • The ruling establishes a precedent for future cases involving the use of digital tracking in bail conditions.
  1. Certificate of Assurance as a Bail Condition

Concerns Raised:

  • Beyond the Accused’s Control: A certificate of assurance is a document issued by a foreign embassy or high commission, guaranteeing that a foreign national will adhere to specific conditions. Since obtaining this certificate depends on the embassy, it is not within the accused’s control.

Supreme Court Decision:

  • The SC ruled that failure to obtain such a certificate should not result in denial of bail, provided other conditions are met.
  • The Court stressed that bail conditions must be reasonable and practically enforceable.
Legal Precedents & Earlier Rulings
  • Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners vs. Union of India & Ors (1994):
    • In this case, foreign nationals were required to obtain a certificate of assurance to ensure they would not leave the country as part of their bail conditions.
    • The recent ruling modifies this approach, reinforcing that bail conditions must be fair and not impose unrealistic obligations on the accused.
« Prev July 2025 Next »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031