- GS-2: Governance (Electoral Reforms, Election Commission’s Role)
- GS-3: Technology in Governance (Voter ID Digitization, Data Management)
Key Highlights
Election Commission’s Plan to Resolve Duplicate Voter IDs:
- Election Commission (EC) acknowledged the issue of duplicate EPIC (Voter ID) numbers.
- EC committed to resolving the issue within 3 months by ensuring a unique national EPIC number for all voters.
- Issue arose due to mismanagement of electoral databases at the State/UT level.
Political Reactions & Criticism:
- Trinamool Congress accused the EC of manipulating voter lists and failing in its duty for decades.
- Mamata Banerjee alleged BJP benefited from EC’s errors in electoral databases.
- Congress also criticized EC, recalling that in 2008, EC had claimed that “voter IDs are unique”, dismissing concerns raised earlier.
Resolution Mechanism & Appeals Process:
- Voters can appeal to District Magistrate/Collector under Section 24(A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 if their voter ID is duplicated.
- A second appeal can be made to the Chief Electoral Officer of the State/UT.
Analysis & Way Forward
- Ensuring unique voter IDs is crucial for free and fair elections.
- Implementing a national voter database with AI-driven de-duplication can prevent future discrepancies.
- Greater accountability and transparency in EC’s electoral roll management is needed.
Mains Mock Question:
“What are the challenges in ensuring a foolproof voter identification system in India? Suggest technological and policy measures to strengthen electoral integrity.”