Context: Recent events in Maharashtra and Delhi have brought to light significant concerns regarding civil service aspirants.
- In Maharashtra, a trainee officer was discovered to have falsified documents, raising serious questions about the integrity of the selection process.
- Meanwhile, in Delhi, three aspirants tragically drowned, highlighting the immense pressure and dangers associated with the pursuit of a civil services career.
Historical Overview of Civil Service in India
- Initially, civil servants for the East India Company were selected through patronage, nominated by the Company’s Directors, and trained at Haileybury College in London.
- Lord Macaulay’s 1854 report led to the introduction of a merit-based system, replacing patronage with competitive examinations.
- The Civil Service Commission was set up in London, with exams commencing in 1855. At first, these exams were only conducted in London. Satyendranath Tagore became the first Indian to pass the exam in 1864.
- The Indian Police Service began admitting Indian candidates in 1920, with open competitions held both in England and India from 1921.
- The Imperial Forest Service, established in 1864, began direct recruitment from England and India in 1920.
- The Aitchinson Commission of 1887 reorganized services into Imperial, Provincial, and Subordinate categories.
- The Government of India Act of 1919 split the Imperial Services into All India Services and Central Services, with the latter under direct control of the central government.
- The Public Service Commission was established in India in 1926, following recommendations from the Lee Commission and the Government of India Act of 1919.
- After India adopted its Constitution in 1950, the Public Service Commission was renamed the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).
Challenges Associated with the Pursuit of Civil Services
- Intense Pressure and Stress: Aspirants face extreme competition and mental strain throughout the rigorous civil services selection process. A 2023 study revealed that over 30% of candidates experience severe stress, with recent tragedies in Delhi underscoring the associated risks (Indian Psychiatry Society Report).
- Exploitation by Coaching Centers: The coaching industry profits from the desperation of aspirants, often delivering poor success rates despite high fees. The industry is valued at ₹20,000 crore, with a success rate of under 1% (NSSO, 2022).
- Cycle of Repeated Failures: Many candidates make multiple attempts with little success, leading to financial and emotional strain. In 2023, 60% of those who passed the prelims had attempted the exam at least three times (UPSC).
- Bureaucratic Inefficiencies: Systemic failures and inadequate regulation exacerbate the challenges faced by aspirants. CAG audits from 2023 revealed lapses in regulatory adherence for coaching institutes.
- Unrealistic Career Expectations: The widespread belief that civil services are the most prestigious career option drives many to pursue it, even when it does not align with their true interests. A 2023 survey found that 50% of young professionals consider civil services their top career choice.
- Burnout Among Successful Candidates: Prolonged efforts to succeed can lead to burnout and reduced motivation once candidates enter the civil services. A 2023 study reported that 40% of new IAS officers experienced burnout within their first year (Indian Journal of Public Administration).
Recommendations
- Limit the Number of Attempts: Restricting the number of attempts allowed can prevent prolonged cycles of failure. Currently, UPSC allows up to six attempts, which contributes to repeated retries without a significant increase in success rates.
- Promote Diverse Career Paths: Encouraging careers in technology, education, and healthcare can help aspirants explore alternative options. Countries like Germany, with diverse career pathways, demonstrate balanced career development.
- Support for Unsuccessful Candidates: Offering career counseling and job placement services can help redirect efforts. The UK’s Career Transition Partnership provides a model for helping individuals find new career paths.
- Regulate the Coaching Industry: Enforcing transparency and quality standards in coaching centers can reduce exploitation. South Korea’s regulations have improved quality and prevented exploitation in similar industries.
- Simplify the Exam Structure: Making exams more straightforward and accessible, such as through online formats, can ease the process. For instance, online testing, like the SAT in the US, enhances accessibility.
- Lower Age Limits: Reducing the upper age limit for candidates can help them start their careers sooner.