Bhutan’s not-so-happy evicted minority

The Himalayan nation of Bhutan, often described as a “Shangri-La” where happiness is equated to wealth, is holding elections this week. But the Lhotshampa people, brutally driven out of the small kingdom in the 1990s, won’t be voting. The Nepali-speaking Lhotshampa were branded as immigrants and stripped of citizenship rights when the then-king introduced a “One Nation, One People” policy in 1985. The edict made following the customs of the Buddhist majority mandatory, including wearing their traditional dress, and speaking Nepali was banned. Those who resisted where labelled “anti-nationals”, arrested and subjected to brutal treatment including rape and torture, according to Amnesty International. The security forces made detainees sign declarations saying they would leave Bhutan voluntarily as a condition of their release. Some 100,000 — one sixth of Bhutan’s population — fled, ending up in refugee camps in eastern Nepal. One man who left Bhutan is Bhumpa Rai, who was serving as a royal doctor when the king’s edict was promulgated. “They humiliated us… they said that we are not Bhutanese and chased me and my people from the country,” Mr. Rai said. Mr. Rai is one of just 7,000 people who remain in the camps in Nepal. The majority have been resettled by the UN in third countries including the U.S., Australia and Norway. But the UN programme ended in late 2016, with those remaining refusing resettlement because they say it absolves the Bhutanese authorities of what they did to the Lhotshampa. Bhutan still describes the Lhotshampa as immigrants, justifying its nationalistic laws as essential for cultural identity and political stability, according to Freedom House, a think tank. “The election results in Bhutan will reflect what the monarchy wants. Its decision won’t come in our favour,” said 80-year-old Durga Prasad Sharma.

Source :

About sree nivas

Check Also

MoU to boost cooperation in Civil Aviation

Syllabus: Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests. Context …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Free Updates to Crack the Exam!
Subscribe to our Newsletter for free daily updates