‘INDIA LOST ACCESS TO 26 OF 65 PATROL POINTS’

ChinmayaIAS Academy - Current Affairs January 25, 2023 Bilateral Relations, GS2 Leave a comment 215 Views

India has lost access to 26 out of 65 Patrolling Points (PP) in eastern Ladakh, according to one of the research papers submitted at last week’s annual police meet in Delhi, accessed by The Hindu.
The “play-safe” approach of the Indian Army that restricts the movement of the district administration and local people in forward areas has turned areas that were once accessible into informal “buffer” zones, the paper said.
It added that to avoid consternation with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that has placed high-resolution cameras at vantage points, the Army restricts the movement of graziers by installing check-posts and deploying personnel in disguise.
The recent disengagement agreements at PP 15 and 16 resulted in the loss of pasture lands in the Gogra hills, North Bank of Pangong Tso, and Kakjung areas.
The paper did not come up for discussion at the annual Director General of Police (DGP) Conference organised by the Intelligence Bureau (IB) that was held from January 20 to 22 and attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah.
It was among 15 research papers submitted by police officers across the country on the subject “Security issues pertaining to unfenced land border”.
The Hindu reported on December 22, 2022 that there are at least 30 PPs in eastern Ladakh along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) that are not being patrolled any more by Indian troops.
These points were regularly patrolled before April-May 2020 when China started amassing troops close to the LAC in eastern Ladakh. Twenty Indian soldiers were killed in clashes with the PLA on June 15, 2020; at least four Chinese soldiers were also killed.

Salami Slicing

The paper stated: “Presently, there are 65 PPs starting from the Karakoram pass to Chumur which are to be patrolled regularly by the ISFs (Indian Security Forces).
Out of 65 PPs, our presence is lost in 26 PPs (i.e. PP no. 5-17, 24-32, 37, 51,52,62) due to restrictive or no patrolling by the ISFs.
Later on, China forces us to accept the fact that, as such areas have not seen the presence of ISFs or civilians for long, the Chinese were present in these areas.
This leads to a shift in the border under the control of ISFs towards the Indian side and a buffer zone is created in all such pockets which ultimately leads to the loss of control over these areas by India. This tactic of PLA to grab land inch-by-inch is known as Salami Slicing.”
A defence source told The Hindu that the LAC in eastern Ladakh is dominated by physical patrolling or technical means and “there is no loss of territory due to disengagement in friction areas”.

Avoiding provocation

“Some areas have been restricted for patrolling for both sides pending diplomatic resolution of disputes. No pasture lands have been lost.
In disengaged areas, we have as many cameras and technical means as the PLA and hence dominate the area as much, if not more,” the source said.
The source added that graziers are encouraged and all facilities are being provided in conjunction with the civil administration.
The paper added that the Army has placed significant restrictions on the movement of civilians and graziers near the forward areas on the Indian side, indicating with their play-safe strategy that they do not want to annoy the PLA by giving them the chance to raise objections on the areas being claimed as disputed.
The defence source added that PPs are benchmark locations mutually agreed upon by both India and China.
“Among the 65 PPs, some remain in contention and all efforts to resolve them are taken by stakeholders concerned [and] is under way….Recently, the PP 15 issue was mutually resolved.
It must be understood that while PPs are sacrosanct, the perception of the LAC isn’t. They are in vogue since 1996, based on the China Study Group guidelines.
They have been patrolled earlier by the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) and over the last few years by the Army.
The delineation of the LAC is as such the role of Ministry of External Affairs and the Army has no role to play in this regard,” the source said.

SOURCE: THE HINDU, THE ECONOMIC TIMES, PIB

Post Views: 43