ADOPTION (FIRST AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2021

• Recently, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a plea seeking to simplify the legal process for child adoption in India.
• In 2021, Adoption (First Amendment) Regulations, 2021 was notified which allowed Indian diplomatic missions abroad to be in charge of safeguarding adopted children whose parents move overseas with the child within two years of adoption. 

Issues Related to Child Adoption in India

• There is a wide gap between adoptable children and prospective parents, which may increase the length of the adoption process.
• Data shows that while more than 29,000 prospective parents are willing to adopt, just 2,317 children are available for adoption.
• Between 2017-19, the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) faced an unusual upsurge in adoptive parents returning children after adopting.
• Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) is a statutory body of the Ministry of Women & Child Development. It functions as the nodal body for adoption of Indian children and is mandated to monitor and regulate in-country and inter-country adoptions.
• According to the data, 60% of all children returned were girls, 24% were children with special needs, and many were older than six.
• The primary reason these ‘disruptions’ occur is that disabled children and older children take much longer to adjust to their adoptive families.
• This is primarily because older children find it challenging to adjust to a new environment because institutions do not prepare or counsel children about living with a new family.
• Only 40 children with disabilities were adopted between 2018 and 2019, accounting for approximately 1% of the total number of children adopted in the year.
• Annual trends reveal that domestic adoptions of children with special needs are dwindling with each passing year.
• In 2018, Ranchi’s Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity came under fire for its “baby-selling racket” after a nun from the shelter confessed to selling four children.
• Similar instances are becoming increasingly common as the pool of children available for adoption shrinks and waitlisted parents grow restless.
• Also, during the pandemic, cases of threat of child trafficking and illegal adoption rackets came into play.
• These rackets usually source children from poor or marginalised families, and unwed women are coaxed or misled into submitting their children to trafficking organisations.
• Despite the constant evolution of the definition of a family, the ‘ideal’ Indian family nucleus still constitutes a husband, a wife and daughter(s) and son(s).
• In February 2021, while addressing petitions seeking the legal recognition of LGBTQI+ marriages, the government opined that LGBTQI+ relationships could not be compared to the “Indian family unit concept” of a husband, wife and children.
• The invalidity of LGBTQI+ marriages and relationships in the eyes of the law obstructs LGBTQI+ persons from becoming parents because the minimum eligibility for a couple to adopt a child is the proof of their marriage.
• To negotiate these unfavourable legalities, illegal adoptions are becoming increasingly common among queer communities.
• Moreover, provisions under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2020 and Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill, 2020 completely exclude LGBTQI+ families, stripping them of their reproductive autonomy.

Way Forward

• The primary purpose of giving a child in adoption is his welfare and restoring his or her right to family.
• CARA and the ministry must accord attention to the vulnerable and invisible community of children silently suffering in our institutions.

SOURCE: THE HINDU,THE ECONOMIC TIMES,MINT